Re: Another possible corruption bug in 9.3.2 or possibly a known MultiXact problem?

On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> TBH I don't care about torn pages during normal testing. I don't want to
> suggest disabling it for real workloads with real data, just that it's
> important to do so during development/testing of WAL related code,
> because otherwise it will hide/fixup many errors.

Sure, but you might want to account for torn pages anyway.
Particularly if you're interested in some degree of automation, as we
all seem to be.


-- 
Peter Geoghegan