Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAM3SWZSe3u3KJ-fXgNwF0GnhahxGQyzwEkOekfA6fSTzQcoEUQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0 (Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:05 AM, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas@vmware.com> wrote: > TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(node->spec != SPEC_INSERT || node->arbiterIndex != > ((Oid) 0))", File: "nodeModifyTable.c", Line: 1619) > > Is that just because of the hack in parse_clause.c? Yes. I never built with assertions and so didn't see this, but it doesn't matter. > With assertions disabled, count_upsert_exclusion.pl ran successfully to the > end. I also tried running "VACUUM FREEZE upsert_race_test" in a loop in > another session at the same time, but it didn't make a difference. How > quickly do you see the errors? > > I also tried applying crash_REL9_5.patch from the jjanes_upsert kit, and set > jj_xid=10000 to increase XID burn rate, but I'm still not seeing any errors. Did you build fully optimized, assertion-free code? I've been doing that. I found it necessary to recreate some of the bugs Jeff's tool caught. I also think that I might have needed an 8 core box to see it, but less sure about that. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: