Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
От | Heikki Linnakangas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54D09D6E.80707@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0 (Peter Geoghegan <pg@heroku.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: INSERT ... ON CONFLICT {UPDATE | IGNORE} 2.0
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/30/2015 01:38 AM, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On the stress-testing front, I'm still running Jeff Janes' tool [1], > while also continuing to use his Postgres modifications to > artificially increase the XID burn rate. > > [1] https://github.com/petergeoghegan/jjanes_upsert I followed the instructions in README.md to reproduce this. I downloaded the tool, applied the upsert patchset, applied the hack to parse_clause.c as instructed in the README.md file, installed btree_gist, and ran count_upsert_exclusion.pl. It failed immediately with an assertion failure: TRAP: FailedAssertion("!(node->spec != SPEC_INSERT || node->arbiterIndex != ((Oid) 0))", File: "nodeModifyTable.c", Line: 1619) Is that just because of the hack in parse_clause.c? With assertions disabled, count_upsert_exclusion.pl ran successfully to the end. I also tried running "VACUUM FREEZE upsert_race_test" in a loop in another session at the same time, but it didn't make a difference. How quickly do you see the errors? I also tried applying crash_REL9_5.patch from the jjanes_upsert kit, and set jj_xid=10000 to increase XID burn rate, but I'm still not seeing any errors. - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: