On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:16 AM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
>
> At the end of the day, this comes down to what is more helpful to the
> user. And I'd agree on the side what ON_ERROR does currently, which
> is what your patch relies on: on the first conversion failure, give up
> and skip the rest of the row because we cannot trust its contents.
> That's my way of saying that I am fine with the proposal of your
> patch, and that we cannot provide the full state of a row without
> making the error stack of COPY more invasive.
+1.
> + <literal>verbose</literal>, a <literal>NOTICE</literal> message
> + containing the line number and column name for each discarded row is
> + emitted.
>
> This should clarify that the column name refers to the attribute where
> the input conversion has failed, I guess. Specifying only "column
> name" without more context is a bit confusing.
Done.
Please see the attached v6 patch set.
--
Bharath Rupireddy
PostgreSQL Contributors Team
RDS Open Source Databases
Amazon Web Services: https://aws.amazon.com