Re: mprove tab completion for ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP
От | vignesh C |
---|---|
Тема | Re: mprove tab completion for ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CALDaNm2Tjb6dwAVNr0WbE4wa8TG4VzcngO3CzRNLupG8bkmG4g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: mprove tab completion for ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>) |
Ответы |
Re: mprove tab completion for ALTER EXTENSION ADD/DROP
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 at 12:19, Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:10:33PM +0900, Kyotaro Horiguchi wrote: > > It suggests the *kinds* of objects that are part of the extension, but > > lists the objects of that kind regardless of dependency. I read > > Michael suggested (and I agree) to restrict the objects (not kinds) to > > actually be a part of the extension. (And not for object kinds.) > > Yeah, that's what I meant. Now, if Vignesh does not want to extend > that, that's fine for me as well at the end on second thought, as this > involves much more code for each DROP path depending on the object > type involved. > > Adding the object names after DROP/ADD is useful on its own, and we > already have some completion once the object type is specified, so > simpler is perhaps just better here. I too felt keeping it simpler is better. How about using the simple first version of patch itself? Regards, Vignesh
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: