Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData
От | David Rowley |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAKJS1f9mTF3yJHe2inW8JzFdWLZNf-_JJCaZY3vnwr6N3ouN8A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData (Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>) |
Ответы |
Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 25 October 2018 at 17:05, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: > On 2018/10/25 12:54, David Rowley wrote: >> On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>> + * key, one for each zero-valued partattrs */ >>> >>> How about: for each zero-valued member of partattrs? >> >> Aren't arrays made up of elements? I did have "element" on the end, >> but I didn't think it was worth having the extra line caused by the 80 >> line length limit, so I deleted it. >> >> Seems "element" is mentioned 73 times in [1], but "member" does not >> get a mention. >> >> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Array_data_structure > > I thought they can be used interchangeably, but perhaps not. A struct or a class has members. -- David Rowley http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: