Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 09fb365a-c8ec-bf9e-8f9b-118afbb33d74@lab.ntt.co.jp обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: A small tweak to some comments for PartitionKeyData (David Rowley <david.rowley@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2018/10/25 13:13, David Rowley wrote: > On 25 October 2018 at 17:05, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >> On 2018/10/25 12:54, David Rowley wrote: >>> On 25 October 2018 at 16:46, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote: >>>> + * key, one for each zero-valued partattrs */ >>>> >>>> How about: for each zero-valued member of partattrs? >>> >>> Aren't arrays made up of elements? I did have "element" on the end, >>> but I didn't think it was worth having the extra line caused by the 80 >>> line length limit, so I deleted it. >>> >>> Seems "element" is mentioned 73 times in [1], but "member" does not >>> get a mention. >>> >>> [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Array_data_structure >> >> I thought they can be used interchangeably, but perhaps not. > > A struct or a class has members. You're right. Thanks, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: