Re: create table like including storage parameter

On Mon, Sep 29, 2025 at 9:28 AM David G. Johnston
<david.g.johnston@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Sunday, September 28, 2025, jian he <jian.universality@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Since we already support INCLUDING STORAGE, I’m not sure that
>> INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER is the right syntax to go with.
>
> I’d just call it “including parameters”; sure, all of the existing ones are storage related, but if there were
non-storageones we’d include those as well, so qualifying with a parameter type doesn’t seem correct. 
>

“including parameters” would add another keyword "PARAMETERS''.
currently "INCLUDING STORAGE PARAMETER" no need to add a new keyword.
If other people favor “including parameters”, then we can do it that
way in the future.

attached is just a simple rebase of v1.