Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
| От | David G. Johnston |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAKFQuwaqtSXAMf4mb3y-+1eegYXdZvx7K4LvgQ6vav=hi=8MSg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote:
>>> Here is what I have, 6 votes clearly stated:
>>> 1. Rename nothing: Daniel,
>>> 2. Rename directory only: Andres
>>> 3. Rename everything: Stephen, Vladimir, David S, Michael P (with
>>> aliases for functions, I could live without at this point...)
> [ vote-counting ]
> Therefore, I plan to go ahead and do #3. Somebody's probably going to
> jump in now with another opinion but I think this thread's gone on
> long enough.
Agreed, let's just get it done.
Although this doesn't really settle whether we ought to do 3a (with
backwards-compatibility function aliases in core) or 3b (without 'em).
Do people want to re-vote, understanding that those are the remaining
choices?
I wouldn't oppose:
CREATE EXTENSION give_me_my_xlog_back;
but my prior thoughts lead me toward not including such functions in the bootstrap catalog.
David J.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: