Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 21710.1486667294@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes: > On Mon, Feb 6, 2017 at 12:29 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> wrote: >>> Here is what I have, 6 votes clearly stated: >>> 1. Rename nothing: Daniel, >>> 2. Rename directory only: Andres >>> 3. Rename everything: Stephen, Vladimir, David S, Michael P (with >>> aliases for functions, I could live without at this point...) > [ vote-counting ] > Therefore, I plan to go ahead and do #3. Somebody's probably going to > jump in now with another opinion but I think this thread's gone on > long enough. Agreed, let's just get it done. Although this doesn't really settle whether we ought to do 3a (with backwards-compatibility function aliases in core) or 3b (without 'em). Do people want to re-vote, understanding that those are the remaining choices? regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: