Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC
| От | Mate Varga |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAK4GaZ7w4yfNCcwcchxJkGc_HC9Pv-s7jzqQh=8t_mV2VqsKCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC (Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
I see -- we could try that, though we're mostly using an ORM (Hibernate) to do this. Thanks!
On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 3:57 PM Dmitry Igrishin <dmitigr@gmail.com> wrote:
пт, 31 авг. 2018 г. в 16:35, Mate Varga <m@matevarga.net>:
>
> Hi,
>
> we're fetching binary data from pg_largeobject table. The data is not very large, but we ended up storing it there. If I'm copying the data to a file from the psql console, then it takes X time (e.g. a second), fetching it through the JDBC driver takes at least 10x more. We don't see this difference between JDBC and 'native' performance for anything except largeobjects (and bytea columns, for the record).
>
> Does anyone have any advice about whether this can be tuned or what the cause is?
I don't know what a reason of that, but I think it's reasonable and
quite simple to call lo_import()/lo_export() via JNI.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: