Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC
| От | Dmitry Igrishin |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAAfz9KNii+UZYpjOW59EnJ7WPQuh8ykmvV6whQ7kdP7Xi3Go4A@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC (Mate Varga <m@matevarga.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: very slow largeobject transfers through JDBC
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
пт, 31 авг. 2018 г. в 16:35, Mate Varga <m@matevarga.net>: > > Hi, > > we're fetching binary data from pg_largeobject table. The data is not very large, but we ended up storing it there. IfI'm copying the data to a file from the psql console, then it takes X time (e.g. a second), fetching it through the JDBCdriver takes at least 10x more. We don't see this difference between JDBC and 'native' performance for anything exceptlargeobjects (and bytea columns, for the record). > > Does anyone have any advice about whether this can be tuned or what the cause is? I don't know what a reason of that, but I think it's reasonable and quite simple to call lo_import()/lo_export() via JNI.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: