Re: What Would You Like To Do?
От | Jaime Casanova |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What Would You Like To Do? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJKUy5iPTnWxwWcc_=W56HhTm4mxWxv48NF8MS_BP0s6XTdKVw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What Would You Like To Do? ("Joshua D. Drake" <jd@commandprompt.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: What Would You Like To Do?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 9:14 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote: > > On 09/14/2011 05:12 AM, Hannu Krosing wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 10:26 -0700, Joshua D. Drake wrote: >> >>>> Complete isolation at the user level, allowing an ISP to support >>>> multiple independent customers on a server without having to fiddle with >>>> multiple back ends each running on a separate port, a feature that MySQL >>>> has had for as far back as I can recall, and one of the reasons ISPs are >>>> more likely to offer MySQL than PostgreSQL. >>> >>> Now this would definitely be nice. It is frustrating that we don't have >>> per database users. >> >> Hmm, what does the GUC db_user_namespace do then ? >> >> it says "Enables per-database user names." > > Last I checked (it has been a few years) that was at best, a hack. I > remember either I or David Fetter? Writing about some issues with it on list > but it was a long time ago. > last time i tried it (last year), it seems broken because i couldn't log in with any user anymore... but it could be that i did something wrong so i didn't report until i could confirm but i hadn't the time and i forgot it since then -- Jaime Casanova www.2ndQuadrant.com Professional PostgreSQL: Soporte 24x7 y capacitación
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: