Re: What Would You Like To Do?
От | Aidan Van Dyk |
---|---|
Тема | Re: What Would You Like To Do? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAC_2qU_XzJZTcTUEiWBa3Fusr2+nAVeYXaN5NkLKnV7NVSYPUA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: What Would You Like To Do? (Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: What Would You Like To Do?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Jaime Casanova <jaime@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > last time i tried it (last year), it seems broken because i couldn't > log in with any user anymore... but it could be that i did something > wrong so i didn't report until i could confirm but i hadn't the time > and i forgot it since then I haven't tried it on 9.0/9.1, but I used it on a 8.4 cluster, and "it worked", with all the caveats of needing all the user@database users created correctly, and the right use of quoting, and @ in logins, etc.... The biggest being the lack of md5... Definitely not "straight forward", and users are still "global", just suffixed with an "@database" to make then "unique" between database namespaces. But I found it useful when needing to hand out "seperate" usernames for different apps because they all needed to have their own search_path and other settings set before login (yes, dumb apps, mostly odbc), and be able to have the same "userid" for different databases, using different settings... a. -- Aidan Van Dyk Create like a god, aidan@highrise.ca command like a king, http://www.highrise.ca/ work like a slave.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: