Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken
От | Greg Fausak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAJ=yfkMZi-+HD9abeBT6dCBAUN8z7KDivfwjKwODnaNk5iu2ig@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Right. Thanks for all the feedback guys. I was just trying to figure out how to do sql/med with partitioned tables. Can't go there, got it. -g On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 11:14 AM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > > "Greg Fausak" <greg@named.com> writes: > >> Here is the bug when trying to use the two together with a rule to bind > >> them: > > > >> create rule "_RETURN" as on select to X do instead select * from Y; > > > > Creating rules on inheritance children isn't supported, and you should > > not hold your breath waiting for it to be. > > > > We probably ought to have something in there to throw an error ... > > Probably not for rules in general, but we shouldn't let people turn > tables into views if they are involved in table inheritance, as either > a parent or a child. > > -- > Robert Haas > EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com > The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company >
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: