Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken
От | Robert Haas |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+TgmoYS8QOURhv8tjZ=mTQ+QMH6w1E1NUVrxfbamLd2USSxog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken
Re: BUG #6286: Table Partitioning - SQL/MED - interaction broken |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Nov 3, 2011 at 5:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > "Greg Fausak" <greg@named.com> writes: >> Here is the bug when trying to use the two together with a rule to bind >> them: > >> create rule "_RETURN" as on select to X do instead select * from Y; > > Creating rules on inheritance children isn't supported, and you should > not hold your breath waiting for it to be. > > We probably ought to have something in there to throw an error ... Probably not for rules in general, but we shouldn't let people turn tables into views if they are involved in table inheritance, as either a parent or a child. -- Robert Haas EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: