Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?
От | Merlin Moncure |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHyXU0yw0FA58Z5yWJ2uTKTOXGDTRFj32fj=xrfXYuy8GahjVA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 3:01 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: >> I didn't design a PERFORM statement. There is two views - somebody >> from sybase's family know so SELECT without into is forwarded to >> client. This functionality is missing on Oracle's family. Is true so >> PERFORM statement is strange, =A0but maybe it's open door for sybase's >> functionality that was not implemented ever. > > I cannot imagine that we'd ever make SELECT inside a plpgsql function > act like that. =A0Functions have no business directly transmitting > information to the client; if they tried, they'd most likely just break > the FE/BE protocol. > > There might be use for such a thing in a hypothetical "real stored > procedure language" where the code is executing in a context entirely > different from what Postgres functions run in ... but that language > would be something different from plpgsql. small aside: I disagreed with this point a while back but I'm coming around to your point of view... merlin
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: