Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 14230.1319140905@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL? (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL?
Re: Can't use WITH in a PERFORM query in PL/pgSQL? |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> writes: > I didn't design a PERFORM statement. There is two views - somebody > from sybase's family know so SELECT without into is forwarded to > client. This functionality is missing on Oracle's family. Is true so > PERFORM statement is strange, but maybe it's open door for sybase's > functionality that was not implemented ever. I cannot imagine that we'd ever make SELECT inside a plpgsql function act like that. Functions have no business directly transmitting information to the client; if they tried, they'd most likely just break the FE/BE protocol. There might be use for such a thing in a hypothetical "real stored procedure language" where the code is executing in a context entirely different from what Postgres functions run in ... but that language would be something different from plpgsql. I grant the argument that people coming from Sybase-ish DBs might be confused by this; but the current arrangement is also confusing lots of people, so I don't think that argument has all that much weight. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: