Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
От | Dickson S. Guedes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHHcrep+nvHw_VqbGMGDYqTtMuVcsQQgqCzjkQGwZdK5vLyaOQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2011/10/18 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas@guedesoft.net> wrote: >> >>> Ah ok! I started reviewing the v4 patch version, this is my comments: >> >> ... >> >>> Well, all the tests was running with the default postgresql.conf in my >>> laptop but I'll setup a more "real world" environment to test for >>> performance regression. Until now I couldn't notice any significant >>> difference in TPS before and after patch in a small environment. I'll >>> post something soon. >> >> Great testing, thanks. Likely will have no effect in non-I/O swamped >> environment, but no regression expected either. > > > Any reason or objection to committing this patch? I didn't see any performance regression (as expected) in the environments that I tested. About the code, I prefer someone with more experience to review it. Thanks. -- Dickson S. Guedes mail/xmpp: guedes@guedesoft.net - skype: guediz http://guedesoft.net - http://www.postgresql.org.br
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: