Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
| От | Simon Riggs |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+U5nMKV8sVoX=Qp+-B4fsjTx5RBE2BgPwmviALfSE5Pm4v1UQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer
Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer Re: Separating bgwriter and checkpointer |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 8:02 AM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 5:10 AM, Dickson S. Guedes <listas@guedesoft.net> wrote: > >> Ah ok! I started reviewing the v4 patch version, this is my comments: > > ... > >> Well, all the tests was running with the default postgresql.conf in my >> laptop but I'll setup a more "real world" environment to test for >> performance regression. Until now I couldn't notice any significant >> difference in TPS before and after patch in a small environment. I'll >> post something soon. > > Great testing, thanks. Likely will have no effect in non-I/O swamped > environment, but no regression expected either. Any reason or objection to committing this patch? -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: