Re: Trivial fix for comment of function table_tuple_lock

On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 7:44 AM Chao Li <li.evan.chao@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 11:41 PM Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I noticed a few other issues. Wouldn’t it be better to fix these together?
>>
>> * changingPart is listed as an output parameter for table_tuple_delete(),
>>     but it looks like an input.
>
>
> Fixed. changingPart is of type bool, it cannot pass out anything.
>
>>
>> * slot is listed as an input parameter for table_tuple_update(), but it seems
>>     to be an output.
>
>
> Fixed. Yes, slot will get some field assigned inside the function.
>
>>
>> * The comment for update_indexes in table_tuple_update() is mis-indented.
>
>
> Fixed. Other parameters use a tab in front, while update_indexes used two white-space in front.
>
>>
>> * Not an issue, but it might be clearer to add a blank line between the input
>>     and output parameter comments in table_tuple_delete() and
>>     table_tuple_update().
>>
>
> Added new lines.

Thanks for updating the patch! LGTM.
Barring any objections, I'll commit it.

I noticed the commit message in the patch lists you as "Author: Chao
Li <lic@highgo.com>",
but in this discussion you've been using "li.evan.chao@gmail.com",
which also seems to be the address used in past commit logs for you.
Which email address would you like me to use in the commit log?

Regards,

--
Fujii Masao