Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwGz=oe1SmxBQy_C8-OJ285Ss_RmF9gqaBDV_R=pS3uypQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 1:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: >> On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> FWIW I'd rather keep plain promotion for a release or two. TBH, I have a >>> bit of trust issues regarding the new method, and I'd like to be able to >>> test potential issues against a stock postgres by doing a normal instead >>> of a fast promotion. > >> So we should add new option specifying the promotion mode, into pg_ctl? >> Currently pg_ctl cannot trigger the normal promotion. > > It would be silly to add such an option if we want to remove the old mode > in a release or two. Without such an option, a user cannot easily trigger the "normal" promotion when we find some problems in fast promotion. In this case, a user needs to create the "promote" file and send the SIGUSR1 signal to postmaster by hand. Or needs to execute pg_ctl promote by using old version (e.g., 9.2) of pg_ctl. Seems confusing. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: