Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 13818.1375762042@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all?
Re: Should we remove "not fast" promotion at all? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> writes: > On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 11:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> FWIW I'd rather keep plain promotion for a release or two. TBH, I have a >> bit of trust issues regarding the new method, and I'd like to be able to >> test potential issues against a stock postgres by doing a normal instead >> of a fast promotion. > So we should add new option specifying the promotion mode, into pg_ctl? > Currently pg_ctl cannot trigger the normal promotion. It would be silly to add such an option if we want to remove the old mode in a release or two. I think what Andres is suggesting is to leave it as-is for 9.4 and then remove the old code in 9.5 or 9.6. Which seems prudent to me. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: