Re: pg_basebackup wish list
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwG9C6OnBy0xbFfv-oWpxawo7kTHdgKG7m0JOjat4xZvxA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup wish list (Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup wish list
Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Peter Eisentraut > <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> On 7/12/16 12:53 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: >>> The --help message for pg_basebackup says: >>> >>> -Z, --compress=0-9 compress tar output with given compression level >>> >>> But -Z0 is then rejected as 'invalid compression level "0"'. The real >>> docs do say 1-9, only the --help message has this bug. Trivial patch >>> attached. >> >> pg_dump --help and man page say it supports 0..9. Maybe we should make >> that more consistent. > > pg_dump actually does support -Z0, though. Well, sort of. It outputs > plain text. Rather than plain text wrapped in some kind of dummy gzip > header, which is what I had naively expected. > > Is that what -Z0 in pg_basebackup should do as well, just output > uncompressed tar data, and not add the ".gz" to the "base.tar" file > name? Yes, I think. What about the attached patch? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
Вложения
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: