Re: pg_basebackup wish list
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup wish list |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwFLzA8BupBMCRisn-mhS4O+BJekzd8k2PQ+4TNkbvZjSg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup wish list (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 3:28 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2016 at 3:06 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff.janes@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Peter Eisentraut >> <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >>> On 7/12/16 12:53 PM, Jeff Janes wrote: >>>> The --help message for pg_basebackup says: >>>> >>>> -Z, --compress=0-9 compress tar output with given compression level >>>> >>>> But -Z0 is then rejected as 'invalid compression level "0"'. The real >>>> docs do say 1-9, only the --help message has this bug. Trivial patch >>>> attached. >>> >>> pg_dump --help and man page say it supports 0..9. Maybe we should make >>> that more consistent. >> >> pg_dump actually does support -Z0, though. Well, sort of. It outputs >> plain text. Rather than plain text wrapped in some kind of dummy gzip >> header, which is what I had naively expected. >> >> Is that what -Z0 in pg_basebackup should do as well, just output >> uncompressed tar data, and not add the ".gz" to the "base.tar" file >> name? > > Yes, I think. What about the attached patch? Barring any objection, I will commit this patch. Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: