Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwEmwRbAp24qV07ChtfeQS-6MfqVUWYkx5zj8TJZOe2RmA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode
& wal_keep_segments
Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > On 2015-02-12 11:44:05 -0800, Sergey Konoplev wrote: >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: >> > This obviously should not be the case. I'll have a look in a couple of hours. Until then you can likely just work aroundthe problem by creating the archive_status directory. >> >> Thank you. Just let me know if you need some extra info or debugging. > > No need for debugging. It's plain and simply a (cherry-pick) conflict I > resolved wrongly during backpatching. 9.3, 9.4 and master do not have > that problem. That whole fix was quite painful because every single > release had significantly different code :(. pg_basebackup/ is pretty > messy. > I'm not sure why my testsuite didn't trigger that problem. Possibly > because a retry makes things work :( > > Somewhat uckily it's 9.2 only (9.3, 9.4 and master look correct, earlier > releases don't have pg_receivexlog) Are you planning to back-patch the fix to 9.2? Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: