Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20150217150545.GD2895@awork2.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_basebackup -x/X doesn't play well with archive_mode & wal_keep_segments (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2015-02-17 12:18:41 +0900, Fujii Masao wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 9:18 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > > On 2015-02-12 11:44:05 -0800, Sergey Konoplev wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> > This obviously should not be the case. I'll have a look in a couple of hours. Until then you can likely just workaround the problem by creating the archive_status directory. > >> > >> Thank you. Just let me know if you need some extra info or debugging. > > > > No need for debugging. It's plain and simply a (cherry-pick) conflict I > > resolved wrongly during backpatching. 9.3, 9.4 and master do not have > > that problem. That whole fix was quite painful because every single > > release had significantly different code :(. pg_basebackup/ is pretty > > messy. > > I'm not sure why my testsuite didn't trigger that problem. Possibly > > because a retry makes things work :( > > > > Somewhat uckily it's 9.2 only (9.3, 9.4 and master look correct, earlier > > releases don't have pg_receivexlog) > > Are you planning to back-patch the fix to 9.2? Now done. Thanks Sergey, Fujii. And sorry for the 9.2 screwup. Greetings, Andres Freund -- Andres Freund http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: