Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
| От | Peter Geoghegan |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAH2-WznnGke6iFfY=CkYVMNsCPeNxcJR0jzqGM4FQQzknujuDA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 28, 2017 at 9:38 PM, Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote: > My apologies for slacking here. I would still welcome some regression > tests to stress the bloom API you are proposing! For now I am moving > this patch to next CF. I still don't think that regression tests as such make sense. However, it seems like it might be a good idea to add a test harness for the Bloom filter code. I actually wrote code like this for myself during development, that could be cleaned up. The hardness can live in source/src/test/modules/test_bloom_filter. We already do this for the red-black tree library code, for example, and it seems like good practice. Would that address your concern? There would be an SQL interface, but it would be trivial. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: