Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
От | Michael Paquier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAB7nPqSBZJofXvhq1MsxZpmip2Z4qupsLr=HyDSup44XrN-3RQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] A design for amcheck heapam verification
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 2:48 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie> wrote: > I still don't think that regression tests as such make sense. However, > it seems like it might be a good idea to add a test harness for the > Bloom filter code. I actually wrote code like this for myself during > development, that could be cleaned up. The hardness can live in > source/src/test/modules/test_bloom_filter. We already do this for the > red-black tree library code, for example, and it seems like good > practice. > > Would that address your concern? There would be an SQL interface, but > it would be trivial. That's exactly what I think you should do, and mentioned so upthread. A SQL interface can also show a good example of how developers can use this API. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: