Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-WzmXc-8W_P=EuOGEHVMM6S=GaxGGpk5hv3Rgvz11U_jHOA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 8:01 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > In fact, that particular experience is one of the worst things about > being a committer. It actively discourages me, at least, from trying > to get other people's patches committed. This particular problem is > minor, but the overall experience of trying to get things committed is > that you have to check 300 things for every patch and if you get every > one of them right then nothing happens and if you get one of them > wrong then you get a bunch of irritated emails criticizing your > laziness, sloppiness, or whatever, and you have to drop everything to > go fix it immediately. What a deal! Yep. Enforcing perfect indentation on koel necessitates rechecking indentation after each and every last-minute fixup affecting C code -- the interactions makes it quite a bit harder to get everything right on the first push. For example, if I spot an issue with a comment during final pre-commit review, and fixup that commit, I have to run pgindent again. On a long enough timeline, I'm going to forget to do that. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: