Re: wal_consistemcy_checking clean on HEAD

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 7:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> wrote:
> It's been on my TODO list to automate that in one of my buildfarm
> animals, and never got down to do it.  I've looked at the current
> animal fleet, and it looks that we don't have one yet.  Perhaps I've
> just missed something?

wal_consistency_checking is very useful in general. I find myself
using it fairly regularly.

That's probably why it's not finding anything now: most people working
on something that touches WAL already know that testing their patch
with wal_consistency_checking early is a good idea. Of course it also
wouldn't be a bad idea to have a BF animal for that, especially
because we already have BF animals that test things far more niche
than this.

--
Peter Geoghegan