Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
От | Peter Geoghegan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAH2-Wz=Nf8RPb4_i_MB1doPSzq5-ufGJPfT5yHdsiU8yCvZcMg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:55 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: > I think shipping with log_checkpoints=on and > log_autovacuum_min_duration=10m or so would be one of the best things > we could possibly do to allow ex-post-facto troubleshooting of > system-wide performance issues. The idea that users care more about > the inconvenience of a handful of extra log messages than they do > about being able to find problems when they have them matches no part > of my experience. I suspect that many users would be willing to incur > *way more* useless log messages than those settings would ever > generate if it meant that they could actually find problems when and > if they have them. I fully agree. -- Peter Geoghegan
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: