Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 39375fbe-cd08-3079-5f93-ee229e0108a5@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box? (Peter Geoghegan <pg@bowt.ie>) |
Ответы |
Re: should we enable log_checkpoints out of the box?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 11/2/21 12:09, Peter Geoghegan wrote: > On Tue, Nov 2, 2021 at 8:55 AM Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> wrote: >> I think shipping with log_checkpoints=on and >> log_autovacuum_min_duration=10m or so would be one of the best things >> we could possibly do to allow ex-post-facto troubleshooting of >> system-wide performance issues. The idea that users care more about >> the inconvenience of a handful of extra log messages than they do >> about being able to find problems when they have them matches no part >> of my experience. I suspect that many users would be willing to incur >> *way more* useless log messages than those settings would ever >> generate if it meant that they could actually find problems when and >> if they have them. > I fully agree. /metoo cheers andrew -- Andrew Dunstan EDB: https://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: