Re: Amazon High I/O instances
От | Sébastien Lorion |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGa5y0Oa6TPcfUqV+XiAMUDq-xkMqgGy+Oi=qZocUSzxCFttwA@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Amazon High I/O instances (John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Amazon High I/O instances
|
Список | pgsql-general |
You set shared_buffers way below what is suggested in Greg Smith book (25% or more of RAM) .. what is the rationale behind that rule of thumb ? Other values are more or less what I set, though I could lower the effective_cache_size and vfs.zfs.arc_max and see how it goes.
Sébastien
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:24 PM, John R Pierce <pierce@hogranch.com> wrote:
On 09/12/12 4:03 PM, Sébastien Lorion wrote:a complex query can require several times work_mem for sorts and hash merges. how many queries do you expect to ever be executing concurrently? I'll take 25% of my system memory and divide it by 'max_connections' and use that as work_mem for most cases.I agree 1GB is a lot, I played around with that value, but it hardly makes a difference. Is there a plateau in how that value affects query performance ? On a master DB, I would set it low and raise as necessary, but what would be a good average value on a read-only DB with same spec and max_connections ?
on a large memory system doing dedicated transaction processing, I generally shoot for about 50% of the server memory as disk cache, 1-2GB as shared_buffers, 512MB-2GB as maintenance_work_mem, and 20-25% as work_mem (divided by max_connections)
--
john r pierce N 37, W 122
santa cruz ca mid-left coast
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: