Re: Amazon High I/O instances
От | John R Pierce |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 505119AB.9010304@hogranch.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Amazon High I/O instances (Sébastien Lorion <sl@thestrangefactory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Amazon High I/O instances
Re: Amazon High I/O instances |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 09/12/12 4:03 PM, Sébastien Lorion wrote: > I agree 1GB is a lot, I played around with that value, but it hardly > makes a difference. Is there a plateau in how that value affects query > performance ? On a master DB, I would set it low and raise as > necessary, but what would be a good average value on a read-only DB > with same spec and max_connections ? a complex query can require several times work_mem for sorts and hash merges. how many queries do you expect to ever be executing concurrently? I'll take 25% of my system memory and divide it by 'max_connections' and use that as work_mem for most cases. on a large memory system doing dedicated transaction processing, I generally shoot for about 50% of the server memory as disk cache, 1-2GB as shared_buffers, 512MB-2GB as maintenance_work_mem, and 20-25% as work_mem (divided by max_connections) -- john r pierce N 37, W 122 santa cruz ca mid-left coast
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: