Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request)
От | Claudio Freire |
---|---|
Тема | Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAGTBQpartOmBJeppiL--sDWUGOUsiiiN=POfw9sVw0kC5+GLkQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request) (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem,
lock_timeout test request)
Re: unified vs context diffs (was Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:08 AM, Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> wrote: > * Heikki Linnakangas (hlinnakangas@vmware.com) wrote: >> So if you want to be kind to readers, look at the patch and choose >> the format depending on which one makes it look better. But there's >> no need to make a point of it when someone posts in "wrong" format. > > To be more precise- my main complaint about this is that this patch is > making changes to multi-line comments and to documentation, both of > which get very annoying to try and read in uniform diff format. > Patches that don't do one or the other of those are likely incomplete > anyway. > > As another point, it's also the very first thing that we document in > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Reviewing_a_Patch to check for. TBH, that wiki link seems to suggest that *having context* is the point of the requirement (to be able to merge with fuzz). Both unified and context formats have context.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: