I don't really have any business being in this discussion, but I figured I'd toss this in anyway. I realize it's not in-line with what many of you are thinking, but it may be a good example to follow if we align expectations with what it provides. Also, apologies if this has come up; I've been trying to follow but there have been a lot of messages.
In the US, to get an Amerature Radio license you have to study the requisite material, which includes the exam questions and answers. The exam is administered by anyone who has passed the VE (Volunteer Examiner) exam and is 2nd or 3rd level. There are currently 3 license levels: Technician, General, and Extra. Each one has more in-depth question, but all of the questions and answers for all levels are public. The exam taken is a randomized subset of those questions. (I believe it's something like 10%? I could be wrong without looking it up.)
As for mechanics of administering the exam, at least three VEs need to be present who are not related to you and who are of the level you're testing for or higher. Due to Covid, remote exams are now allowed/more common, but are done with webcam on during the exam so the VE can watch.
While this is obviously easy to game, the expectation is that if you passed the exam, even if you only studied the questions and answers, you'd have the basic amount of knowledge needed to operate at the license level you passed with.
Jim
Guys,
I still have bad memories when we tried this the last time some 15 years ago.
Let's do this in small steps:
- Create a mail list just for this thread
- Instead of creating an approved certification how's about developing an RFC of sorts outlining expected competencies for various classifications of knowledge (that should be real fun) is expected to carry out certain tasks. Then, after there's some sort of agreement in the community.
Hope this helps.
Robert Bernier
robert.bernier@percona.com