Re: psql: add \create_function command
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: psql: add \create_function command |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRDrg2a=2vRDn=gaWENUHZxubK_mP8MPX6twHR=6NdYPMw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: psql: add \create_function command (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: psql: add \create_function command
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
po 29. 1. 2024 v 18:11 odesílatel Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> napsal:
Steve Chavez <steve@supabase.io> writes:
> However, :{?variable_name} is already taken by psql to test whether a
> variable is defined or not. It might be confusing to use the same syntax.
Hmm. Maybe we could go with :{+...} or the like?
> How about using the convention of interpreting an identifier as a file path
> if it has an slash on it?
Sorry, that is just horrid. foo/bar means division, and "foo/bar"
is simply an identifier per SQL standard, so you can't squeeze that
in without breaking an ocean of stuff. Plus, there are many use-cases
where there's no reason to put a slash in a relative filename.
sometimes paths starts by $ or .
or maybe :{{ ... }}
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: