Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRCb+KQBF1AuZnYazjHET_Y9v=gc5hV1cmWNRhmaTpjGXw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress (Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2017-02-14 3:36 GMT+01:00 Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de>:
On 2017-02-13 20:59:43 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> Hi
>
> 2017-02-13 6:46 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > here is new update - check is done before any creating
> >
> > It may be better to do any checks before dropping existing databases
> > as well... It would be as well just simpler to complain with a single
> > error message like "database and template list lengths do not match".
> >
>
> next step
I still fail to see why --use-existing as suggested in
https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170208002900. vkldujzfkwbvqqq7@alap3. anarazel.de
isn't sufficient.
I checked it - and it is not hard - but you have to overwrite some makefile rules - and then you spend some time with makefile hacking
Possibility to set template removes all this dirty work. Setting "REGRESS_OPTS += --template=mytests-template" is simple, clean and readable
Regards
Pavel
- Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: