Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
От | Andres Freund |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20170214023639.pkk542hwk2e7gqbt@alap3.anarazel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress
Re: [HACKERS] possibility to specify template database for pg_regress |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2017-02-13 20:59:43 +0100, Pavel Stehule wrote: > Hi > > 2017-02-13 6:46 GMT+01:00 Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>: > > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > here is new update - check is done before any creating > > > > It may be better to do any checks before dropping existing databases > > as well... It would be as well just simpler to complain with a single > > error message like "database and template list lengths do not match". > > > > next step I still fail to see why --use-existing as suggested in https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/20170208002900.vkldujzfkwbvqqq7@alap3.anarazel.de isn't sufficient. - Andres
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: