Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern...
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern... |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRCXPZc8xc4n_mv-AAaC5XVYN=pWmALrbuNim2PQdak0qw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern... (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump)
when pattern...
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi
2015-09-11 17:59 GMT+02:00 Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>:
https://commitfest.postgresql.org/6/201/
Patch looks good and is helpful in some usecases. I found and fix some typo (new version in attach), but patch shows some inconsistent output:
% pg_dump -t 'aaa*' postgres
pg_dump: No matching tables were found
% pg_dump -t 'aaa*' --strict-names postgres
pg_dump: Table "aaa*" not found.
In second case error message is obviously worse.
There are two different situation - first message says "there are not any table for work", second says "There are not specific table(s) with specific names (mask)". I am thinking so this information is enough interesting for showing.
Can be changed to "No matching table(s) were found for filter "aaa*" " ?
Regards
Pavel
--
Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru
WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: