Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern...
От | Teodor Sigaev |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 55F69C04.5020203@sigaev.ru обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern... (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Review: check existency of table for -t option (pg_dump) when pattern...
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> (new version in attach), but patch shows some inconsistent output: > % pg_dump -t 'aaa*' postgres > pg_dump: No matching tables were found > % pg_dump -t 'aaa*' --strict-names postgres > pg_dump: Table "aaa*" not found. > There are two different situation - first message says "there are not any table > for work", second says "There are not specific table(s) with specific names > (mask)". I am thinking so this information is enough interesting for showing. Agree, but "aaa*" is not a table > > Can be changed to "No matching table(s) were found for filter "aaa*" " ? "TBL" is not a filter. May be: No matching table(s) were found for pattern "aaa*" ? No matching table(s) were found for pattern "TBL" ? -- Teodor Sigaev E-mail: teodor@sigaev.ru WWW: http://www.sigaev.ru/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: