Re: proposal: enhancing slow query log, and autoexplain log about waiting on lock before query exec time
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: enhancing slow query log, and autoexplain log about waiting on lock before query exec time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRC2Ldm=Xt64dE0zi59NYkLPBXs0AnVTwQ8fsLF3P8iRCg@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: enhancing slow query log, and autoexplain log about waiting on lock before query exec time (Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: enhancing slow query log, and autoexplain log
about waiting on lock before query exec time
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2016-02-17 3:43 GMT+01:00 Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@bluetreble.com>:
On 2/14/16 11:24 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:> We have a patch, that inject logs about the time waiting on locks before
> query execution. This feature helps us lot of, and I hope, it can be
> generally useful.
Doesn't log_lock_waits cover that territory already?
It does. But It creates different log entry - and can be hard to join
slow query with log entry sometimes lot of lines before. This proposal
is about taking important information comfortably - and log parsing and
processing is simpler.
I'm all for anything that improves visibility into locking, but it seems like this is more a band-aid than a fix. Certainly any real analysis of logfiles means you're stuck with something like pgBadger. If this would significantly simply pgBadger's job then great, but I don't think that's the case.
What would be useful logging-wise is if the log line for the query itself could contain lock wait time, but that doesn't sound like what you're proposing?
I hope, so I propose this idea. First time I wanted talk about the idea. Next step is the talk about format.
What I think would be far more useful is adding lock wait time info to pg_stat_statements and maybe pg_stat_*_tables.
If we can enhance primary log, auto_explain, then we can do same with pg_stat_statements.
lock statistics in table or database level would be great - it is good simple indicator about application health, but it is for another proposal (and patch). I can propose it, or I can collaborate on it with pleasure.
Regards
Pavel
--
Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX
Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL
Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: