Re: proposal: enhancing slow query log, and autoexplain log about waiting on lock before query exec time
От | Jim Nasby |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: enhancing slow query log, and autoexplain log about waiting on lock before query exec time |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 56C3DE3E.1000705@BlueTreble.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: enhancing slow query log, and autoexplain log about waiting on lock before query exec time (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: enhancing slow query log, and autoexplain log
about waiting on lock before query exec time
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/14/16 11:24 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > > We have a patch, that inject logs about the time waiting on locks before > > query execution. This feature helps us lot of, and I hope, it can be > > generally useful. > > Doesn't log_lock_waits cover that territory already? > > It does. But It creates different log entry - and can be hard to join > slow query with log entry sometimes lot of lines before. This proposal > is about taking important information comfortably - and log parsing and > processing is simpler. I'm all for anything that improves visibility into locking, but it seems like this is more a band-aid than a fix. Certainly any real analysis of logfiles means you're stuck with something like pgBadger. If this would significantly simply pgBadger's job then great, but I don't think that's the case. What would be useful logging-wise is if the log line for the query itself could contain lock wait time, but that doesn't sound like what you're proposing? What I think would be far more useful is adding lock wait time info to pg_stat_statements and maybe pg_stat_*_tables. -- Jim Nasby, Data Architect, Blue Treble Consulting, Austin TX Experts in Analytics, Data Architecture and PostgreSQL Data in Trouble? Get it in Treble! http://BlueTreble.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: