Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2
| От | Pavel Stehule |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CAFj8pRBr=RB_K6Uzr1Kzqtxy1Nx1JAsAS0Zj+raNFff_uobaVQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 (Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
2014-09-04 15:38 GMT+02:00 Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info>:
On 09/04/2014 09:31 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:I think I like the COMMAND CONSTRAINT the best so far.
I not, because when it will not be part of SQL, than parser in plpgsql
will be more complex. You have to inject SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE
Making the COMMAND CONSTRAINT part of the core SQL parser was how I understood Hannu's idea. It would be horrible to tuck that feature away inside of a PL, rather than making it available to all PLs as well as applications, that use SQL directly (I think there still are two or three applications that do).
So I am happy so we have agreement, so implementation on PL level can be terrible.
Pavel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: