Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 54086B51.3040300@wi3ck.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2 (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/pgSQL 1.2
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/04/2014 09:31 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote: > 2014-09-04 15:24 GMT+02:00 Jan Wieck <jan@wi3ck.info > > I think I like the COMMAND CONSTRAINT the best so far. > > > I not, because when it will not be part of SQL, than parser in plpgsql > will be more complex. You have to inject SELECT, UPDATE, INSERT, DELETE Making the COMMAND CONSTRAINT part of the core SQL parser was how I understood Hannu's idea. It would be horrible to tuck that feature away inside of a PL, rather than making it available to all PLs as well as applications, that use SQL directly (I think there still are two or three applications that do). Regards, Jan -- Jan Wieck Senior Software Engineer http://slony.info
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: