Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRBjoMfioYyQQN9NovvHG03ZFqQkdEuL1NgdVVSOZgkaog@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression (Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
čt 19. 3. 2020 v 10:47 odesílatel Amit Langote <amitlangote09@gmail.com> napsal:
Hi Pavel,
Sorry it took me a while to look at this.
On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:28 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote:
> po 24. 2. 2020 v 18:56 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> napsal:
>> But I found one issue - I don't know if this issue is related to your patch or plpgsql_check.
>>
>> plpgsql_check try to clean after it was executed - it cleans all plans. But some pointers on simple expressions are broken after catched exceptions.
>>
>> expr->plan = 0x80. Is interesting, so other fields of this expressions are correct.
>
> I am not sure, but after patching the SPI_prepare_params the current memory context is some short memory context.
>
> Can SPI_prepare_params change current memory context? It did before. But after patching different memory context is active.
I haven't been able to see the behavior you reported. Could you let
me know what unexpected memory context you see in the problematic
case?
How I can detect it? Are there some steps for debugging memory context?
Pavel
--
Thank you,
Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: