Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression
От | Amit Langote |
---|---|
Тема | Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CA+HiwqHB3WgZ+EmrqsFApLdS3rQMiyMQoMYskSStOLJ2pq_PCQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression
Re: plan cache overhead on plpgsql expression |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hi Pavel, Sorry it took me a while to look at this. On Tue, Feb 25, 2020 at 4:28 AM Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> wrote: > po 24. 2. 2020 v 18:56 odesílatel Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> napsal: >> But I found one issue - I don't know if this issue is related to your patch or plpgsql_check. >> >> plpgsql_check try to clean after it was executed - it cleans all plans. But some pointers on simple expressions are brokenafter catched exceptions. >> >> expr->plan = 0x80. Is interesting, so other fields of this expressions are correct. > > I am not sure, but after patching the SPI_prepare_params the current memory context is some short memory context. > > Can SPI_prepare_params change current memory context? It did before. But after patching different memory context is active. I haven't been able to see the behavior you reported. Could you let me know what unexpected memory context you see in the problematic case? -- Thank you, Amit
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: