Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt
От | Pavel Stehule |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAFj8pRArKm6c+6-3UweWrSM5_MuEFYmSNJmzdSgNUFXJExYQ=g@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
so 19. 9. 2020 v 0:42 odesílatel Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> napsal:
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:40:30PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote:
> May be I am wrong, but it seems to me that not so much people know about
> pgxn.org
> Before writing this mail I have tried to locate such resource in Google and
> didn't succeed.
>
> yes, It is not strongly joined with the Postgres community, and it doesn't
> deploy binary (compiled) code if I know it. So for some people it is not
> usable.
>
> But anytime this and similar repositories will have problems, because the
> extensions there are not reviewed, nobody did security check, nobody did QA.
>
> This is useful for Postgres developers, for very advanced users, or for very
> fearless users :).
I think if PGXN had more must-have extensions, its popularity would
increase.
There is nothing else. But it can be much more useful, if somebody does review, or if allows compilation to target platform on server side, if has integrated tests, ...
Regards
Pavel
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com
The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: