Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20200918224224.GD30016@momjian.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal of new PostgreSQL Extension - PGSpiderExt
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 05:40:30PM +0200, Pavel Stehule wrote: > May be I am wrong, but it seems to me that not so much people know about > pgxn.org > Before writing this mail I have tried to locate such resource in Google and > didn't succeed. > > yes, It is not strongly joined with the Postgres community, and it doesn't > deploy binary (compiled) code if I know it. So for some people it is not > usable. > > But anytime this and similar repositories will have problems, because the > extensions there are not reviewed, nobody did security check, nobody did QA. > > This is useful for Postgres developers, for very advanced users, or for very > fearless users :). I think if PGXN had more must-have extensions, its popularity would increase. -- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> https://momjian.us EnterpriseDB https://enterprisedb.com The usefulness of a cup is in its emptiness, Bruce Lee
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: